What Is the Difference Between Amazon FBA and FBM? A Seller’s Decision Guide

Fast Answer: The difference between Amazon FBA and FBM (in one sentence)

Direct answer: FBA means Amazon stores your inventory and handles pick/pack/ship (and much of the customer-facing fulfillment work). FBM means you (or your 3PL) store inventory and ship orders yourself, so you own day-to-day fulfillment operations.
Reference for definitions and program framing: https://sell.amazon.com/blog/fba-vs-fbm

Key points (micro-bullets)

• Storage: FBA = Amazon warehouses; FBM = your warehouse/3PL.
• Shipping: FBA = Amazon fulfills orders; FBM = you/3PL buy labels and ship.
• Customer service & returns: FBA generally reduces your fulfillment workload; FBM requires your own processes.
• Control: FBM usually gives more hands-on control over packaging/handling; FBA outsources more execution.

Boundary conditions

• “FBM” can be in-house or run through a third-party logistics provider (3PL).
• Exact workflows and program details can vary by category and marketplace—use Amazon’s current guidance for specifics.

Next question prompt: Are you trying to optimize for time and simplicity, or control and fulfillment flexibility?

Definitions: What is Amazon FBA? What is Amazon FBM (and MFN)?

Direct answer: Amazon uses “FBA” and “FBM” to describe who fulfills orders—Amazon (FBA) or the merchant (FBM).

Helpful official baseline pages:

• FBA overview: https://sell.amazon.com/fulfillment-by-amazon
• FBM overview: https://sell.amazon.com/programs/fulfilled-by-merchant

Key definitions

• FBA (Fulfillment by Amazon): You send inventory to Amazon; Amazon stores it and fulfills customer orders from their network.
• FBM (Fulfilled by Merchant): You (or your 3PL) store inventory and ship orders directly to customers.
• MFN (Merchant Fulfilled Network): Often used as another way to refer to merchant-fulfilled selling (commonly aligned with FBM terminology).

Boundary conditions

• Some articles use “MFN” and “FBM” interchangeably; when in doubt, follow Amazon’s definitions in Seller Central and official program pages.

Next question prompt: Which part feels harder for you right now—shipping operations or getting inventory positioned and in stock?

Who does what: FBA vs FBM responsibilities (side-by-side table)

Direct answer: The core difference is task ownership: FBA outsources more fulfillment execution to Amazon, while FBM keeps the seller (or a 3PL) responsible for the fulfillment workflow.
Reference framing: https://sell.amazon.com/blog/fba-vs-fbm

Why this matters: Responsibilities drive cost drivers, workload, and how predictable your operations feel day to day.

Responsibilities table

Fulfillment task	FBA (Fulfilled by Amazon)	FBM (Fulfilled by Merchant / MFN)
Inventory storage	Stored in Amazon’s network	Stored in your warehouse or 3PL
Pick/pack/ship	Amazon handles fulfillment steps	You/3PL pick, pack, label, and ship
Shipping label purchasing	Typically managed within Amazon’s fulfillment system	You/3PL choose carriers, rates, and ship methods
Customer-facing delivery experience	Often aligns with Amazon network expectations	Depends on your shipping speed, cutoffs, and carrier performance
Customer messages (fulfillment-related)	Reduced operational load (varies by situation)	You handle shipping questions, address changes, and delivery issues
Returns handling	Amazon handles many steps (varies by situation)	You manage returns routing, inspection, restock/disposal decisions
Inventory planning touchpoints	Replenishment into Amazon + receiving constraints	Inventory placement across your warehouse/3PL + carrier planning

What sellers still always own (both models)

• Listing quality, pricing strategy, inventory decisions, and product compliance.
• Customer experience decisions (policies, brand presentation) within Amazon’s rules.

Boundary conditions

• In FBM, your reality depends heavily on whether you fulfill in-house or via a 3PL.
• Program rules and operational details can change; treat official Amazon pages as the baseline.

Next question prompt: Do you already have a reliable warehouse/3PL and shipping process—or would you be building that from scratch?

Cost differences: the driver model (and where to verify current fees)

Direct answer: FBA and FBM can both be “cost-effective,” but they allocate costs differently. FBA concentrates costs into Amazon fees and storage-related charges, while FBM shifts costs into your own storage/3PL, labor, packaging, carrier shipping, and returns operations.

Key cost drivers (no stale numbers)

• FBA tends to concentrate costs in: fulfillment-related fees, storage-related fees, inbound shipping and prep/compliance to send inventory into Amazon.
• FBM tends to concentrate costs in: warehouse/3PL storage and handling, labor and packing materials, carrier shipping charges, returns processing and restocking decisions.

Cost driver mini-table

Cost driver	FBA (typical pattern)	FBM (typical pattern)
Storage	You pay Amazon for storage services	You pay your warehouse/3PL (or your own space)
Fulfillment labor	Mostly outsourced into Amazon fees	You/3PL pay labor to pick/pack/ship
Shipping	Often embedded in the fulfillment service model	You/3PL pay carriers per shipment
Packaging	Must meet Amazon requirements; prep may be needed	You choose materials and SOPs; brand control may be higher
Returns	Many steps can be handled through Amazon processes	You manage routing, inspection, and restock decisions

Where to verify current fees (without copying tables)

• Start at Amazon’s pricing/fees hub and follow through to the current documentation and calculators: https://sell.amazon.com/pricing
• Use Seller Central’s tools and current fee documentation for the most accurate, up-to-date rates (fees can change).
• When comparing FBM, verify your carrier rates, packaging costs, labor, and 3PL pricing (if applicable).

Boundary conditions

• Total cost depends on product size/weight, destination, seasonality, return rate, carrier pricing, and current fee schedules.
• Avoid deciding on a single fee line—use a total “fulfillment cost per order” view for your SKU.

Next question prompt: For your products, which is more uncertain right now—Amazon fee impact or your shipping/3PL execution costs?

Which is better (and more profitable): FBA vs FBM depends on your situation

Direct answer: There’s no universal “better.” FBA often wins on time savings and outsourced operations; FBM often wins on control and fulfillment flexibility. Profitability depends on your cost drivers and how well you execute fulfillment.

Define what “better” means for you

• Profit: total fulfillment cost vs margin
• Time: how much operational work you can handle
• Control: packaging, inserts, multi-channel fulfillment, special handling
• Customer experience: delivery expectations and returns experience
• Scalability: ability to handle spikes without breaking SOPs

When FBA tends to fit

• You want to reduce day-to-day fulfillment workload.
• You have consistent demand and can replenish inventory into Amazon regularly.
• You prefer a simpler operating model than managing carriers/warehouse daily.
• Your team capacity is limited and you’d rather outsource fulfillment execution.

When FBM tends to fit

• You want tighter control over packaging, bundling, or special handling.
• You have strong shipping/warehouse capability (in-house or a reliable 3PL).
• You plan to fulfill multi-channel (Amazon + DTC) from the same inventory pool.
• You can manage shipping SLAs and customer support consistently.

Quick chooser table (decision grid)

If your priority is…	FBA often fits when…	FBM often fits when…
Saving time	You want Amazon to execute fulfillment	You can run or outsource shipping reliably
Maximizing control	You accept less packaging control	You need custom packaging/SOPs
Cost predictability	You prefer an Amazon fee-based structure	You have stable carrier/3PL costs and strong ops
Flexibility	You’re okay with inbound + network constraints	You want to route inventory across channels/locations

Decision checklist (answer “yes/no”)

1. Can you reliably ship orders same/next day with clear cutoffs (or have a 3PL that can)?
2. Do you have warehouse space (or 3PL capacity) to store inventory and manage returns?
3. Is packaging control (branding/inserts/special handling) a key requirement?
4. Do you plan to fulfill other channels from the same inventory?
5. Are your carrier rates competitive and stable enough to forecast?
6. Can you handle customer messages and return workflows consistently?
7. Is your main constraint time/ops bandwidth (push toward outsourcing) or flexibility/control (push toward merchant fulfillment)?

Boundary conditions

• Avoid assuming “more profitable” without testing—profitability depends on total cost and execution quality.
• Don’t assume Prime outcomes or Buy Box outcomes; those are influenced by multiple factors and can change.
• For many catalogs, the “best” answer is often hybrid per SKU (see next section).

Next question prompt: Which single constraint is most limiting right now—cash tied in inventory, time to fulfill, or shipping performance consistency?

Prime, delivery expectations, and Seller Fulfilled Prime (SFP)

Direct answer: FBA is often aligned with delivery expectations because fulfillment runs through Amazon’s network. With FBM, customer experience depends on your shipping speed, cutoffs, carrier reliability, and returns/customer support processes.

Key points

• FBA: often reduces fulfillment complexity and supports consistent delivery operations through Amazon’s fulfillment network.
• FBM: can work well when you have strong shipping execution and clear support/returns processes.
• SFP: an adjacent program concept where sellers fulfill orders while meeting Prime shipping standards; requirements can change, so treat it as “check current rules,” not a guarantee.

What changes the answer

• Your ship-from locations and carrier performance.
• Your ability to maintain consistent cutoffs, tracking, and on-time delivery.
• Current program requirements and eligibility rules.

Boundary conditions

• Don’t promise Prime eligibility; verify current requirements in Seller Central and official program documentation.

Next question prompt: Do you have the operational setup to consistently meet strict shipping performance targets if you choose FBM?

Workload and control: what you outsource vs what you manage

Direct answer: FBA typically outsources more day-to-day fulfillment work to Amazon. FBM typically increases operational control—but also increases the work you (or your 3PL) must manage to hit shipping and customer experience expectations.

Trade-off table

Dimension	FBA (typical pattern)	FBM (typical pattern)
Daily fulfillment labor	Lower for the seller	Higher unless 3PL handles it
Packaging/control	More standardized; less hands-on control	More flexibility for SOPs and brand needs
Returns workflow	Many steps handled through Amazon processes	You must build/manage returns SOPs
Customer service load (fulfillment-related)	Often reduced	You manage shipping issues and returns communication
Operational complexity	Inbound + replenishment planning	Warehouse/3PL ops + carrier + returns ops

Minimum setup checklist for FBM (practical reality)

• Shipping cutoffs and carrier pickup plan
• Standard packing SOPs and materials
• A returns SOP (where returns go, inspection steps, restock/disposal rules)
• Customer support coverage for delivery and return issues
• Inventory visibility (to prevent overselling and stockouts)

Boundary conditions

• FBM workload varies hugely depending on whether you use a 3PL and how automated your shipping process is.
• Hybrid strategies can reduce risk but add planning complexity.

Next question prompt: If you switched to FBM tomorrow, which SOP is weakest—shipping, returns, or customer support coverage?

Hybrid strategy: use FBA and FBM together (how to decide per SKU)

Direct answer: Yes—many sellers run a hybrid approach, using FBA for some SKUs and FBM for others. The key is choosing a “default method” per SKU based on velocity, handling needs, and fulfillment constraints.

Per-SKU steps (5–7)

1. Segment SKUs by velocity, size/weight, margin cushion, and seasonality.
2. Mark constraint SKUs (special packaging, fragile items, high returns, oversized shipping complexity).
3. Pick a default method per SKU: FBA where outsourcing helps; FBM where control/flexibility wins.
4. Plan inventory splits (if needed): where each SKU will be stored (Amazon vs warehouse/3PL).
5. Set replenishment triggers to avoid stockouts and avoid over-splitting inventory.
6. Pilot and measure: compare cost drivers and operational effort.
7. Review seasonally and adjust.

Optional SKU segmentation table

SKU profile	Often a good first test for…	Why
High-velocity, predictable demand	FBA	Outsourcing reduces daily ops burden and helps consistency
Needs custom packaging/inserts	FBM	More control over SOPs and brand presentation
Highly seasonal	Hybrid	Flex between methods as demand changes
High returns complexity	Either (test)	Choose based on where your returns SOP is strongest

Watch-outs (hybrid complexity)

• Inventory fragmentation can cause stockouts even when you have stock “somewhere.”
• Forecasting mistakes can create unnecessary storage or shipping pressure.
• Switching methods requires SOP changes (returns routing, customer comms, packaging).
• Managing both FBA inbound and FBM ops increases planning overhead.

Boundary conditions

• Hybrid may not be worth it for very small catalogs; start simple and expand only if it adds value.

Next question prompt: Which SKUs are the most risky operationally—oversize, fragile, high-return, or highly seasonal?

Common mistakes when switching between FBA and FBM (and how to fix them)

Direct answer: Most switching failures come from underestimating operations—shipping cutoffs, inventory planning, and returns/customer support—plus using stale assumptions about fees or shipping rates.

Mistakes checklist (avoid these)

• Switching to FBM without clear shipping cutoffs and carrier pickup reliability.
• Underestimating packing labor and packaging material costs in FBM.
• No returns SOP (where returns go, inspection, restock rules).
• Weak customer support coverage for delivery exceptions and return questions.
• Splitting inventory across FBA and FBM without a replenishment plan (stockouts).
• Comparing FBA vs FBM using outdated fees or outdated carrier rates.
• Onboarding a 3PL without clear SLAs, labeling rules, and exception handling.
• Changing fulfillment method without updating SOPs and operational expectations.

If/then fixes (practical)

• If FBM shipments run late, then set earlier cutoffs, automate label buying, and confirm daily carrier pickup.
• If FBM packing time is too high, then standardize packaging SOPs and pre-kit materials.
• If returns overwhelm your team, then create a returns triage SOP and reconsider which SKUs should be fulfilled differently.
• If FBA costs surprise you, then re-check current fee documentation and re-evaluate which SKUs belong in FBA vs FBM.
• If hybrid causes stockouts, then reduce inventory splitting and set replenishment triggers before expanding hybrid scope.
• If 3PL execution is inconsistent, then tighten SLAs and limit 3PL to a smaller SKU set until stable.

Boundary conditions

• Switching is an operational transition; plan SOPs and monitoring instead of a one-time “flip.”
• Fees and rates change; always verify current info in Seller Central and with carriers/3PLs.

Next question prompt: What’s your biggest switching risk—late shipments, inventory stockouts, or returns handling?

FAQ

• Q: What is the main difference between Amazon FBA and FBM?
  A: FBA means Amazon stores and fulfills orders for you; FBM means you (or a 3PL) store inventory and ship orders yourself. The difference is who owns fulfillment execution day to day. https://sell.amazon.com/blog/fba-vs-fbm
• Q: What is Amazon FBA and what is Amazon FBM (and is FBM the same as MFN)?
  A: FBA is “Fulfillment by Amazon” (you send inventory to Amazon; Amazon fulfills). FBM is “Fulfilled by Merchant” (you/3PL fulfill). MFN is commonly used to describe merchant-fulfilled selling and is often aligned with FBM terminology. https://sell.amazon.com/fulfillment-by-amazon and https://sell.amazon.com/programs/fulfilled-by-merchant
• Q: Which is better, FBA or FBM?
  A: It depends on your constraints. FBA often reduces operational workload; FBM often increases control and flexibility. Many sellers choose per SKU and use a hybrid approach.
• Q: Is Amazon FBM more profitable?
  A: Sometimes, but not always. FBM can be more profitable when shipping/warehouse costs are optimized and execution is strong; FBA can be more profitable when outsourcing reduces labor/time and improves consistency. Compare total cost drivers per SKU rather than assuming one model wins universally.
• Q: How much does Amazon FBM cost?
  A: FBM costs vary and usually include your shipping labels, packaging, labor, and storage (plus any 3PL fees). Build a per-order cost model using your carrier rates and operational costs, then compare against current official fee documentation for FBA. Official fee entry point: https://sell.amazon.com/pricing
• Q: Can you use FBA and FBM at the same time?
  A: Yes. Many sellers use FBA for SKUs where outsourcing fulfillment saves time and improves consistency, and FBM for SKUs that need more control or different shipping economics. Use a per-SKU segmentation approach and set replenishment rules to avoid stockouts.
• Q: What mistakes should you avoid when switching between FBA and FBM?
  A: Underestimating FBM ops (cutoffs, returns SOPs, support coverage), relying on stale fee/rate assumptions, and splitting inventory without a replenishment plan are top mistakes. Pilot changes on a small SKU set first and add if/then fixes for common failures.
• Q: Do I need an LLC to sell on Amazon FBM?
  A: Not necessarily. Whether you need an LLC depends on your jurisdiction, risk tolerance, and tax/legal situation—not on whether you use FBM or FBA. Consider local guidance and professional advice (not legal advice).

Summary & Next Steps

Direct answer: FBA vs FBM is mainly about who fulfills (Amazon vs you/3PL). The best choice depends on your cost drivers, operational capacity, and SKU constraints—and many sellers end up using both.

Key takeaways

• Start with responsibilities: who stores, ships, handles returns, and supports customers.
• Compare costs by drivers, not stale numbers; verify current fees in Seller Central and official pricing pages.
• Decide by scenario and SKU profile; don’t assume one model is universally better.
• If switching, treat it as an operational transition with SOPs, cutoffs, and monitoring.

Next steps

• Pick 1–3 SKUs and run a simple driver-based comparison (FBA vs FBM total cost drivers + operational effort).
• If considering FBM, confirm your shipping SOP, returns SOP, and customer support coverage.
• If considering hybrid, define replenishment triggers to prevent stockouts from inventory splits.

Boundary conditions

• Fees, programs, and requirements change; verify current details in Seller Central and official Amazon documentation.
• Don’t treat Prime/SFP outcomes as guaranteed; check current eligibility rules.

Next question prompt: What’s your current constraint—shipping operations, inventory planning, or cost predictability?

Back to top